Tapered Screw-Vent® (TSV) Dental Implant System

A Legacy Of Performance

With over 20 years of clinical use and millions of implants sold, the TSV Implant has gained the trust of thousands of surgeons worldwide to deliver successful patient outcomes.

Benefits Features Advantages Clinical Success Resources FAQ's Contact Us SHOP ONLINE

The Navigator® System for Guided Surgery

Benefits

Experience the confidence provided by a history of success.

Designed for immediacy^2,7,15

The primary stability achieved by TSV Implants enables immediate placement and/or immediate loading in appropriately selected patients.

Favorable conditions for crestal bone maintenance^21,22

The proprietary internal hex creates a Friction Fit Connection that shields the crestal bone from occlusal force.

Features

MTX ® or MP-1® HA Surfaces

High bone-to-implant contact and osteoconductive capacity^16,17,36

Soft and Dense Bone Protocols

Enables bone compression and stability in poor quality sites¹⁵

Coronal Options

Available with and without coronal microgrooves and texturing to address clinical preferences

TSV Implant Configurations available on select implants Model: TSV

TSV Implant Configurations available on select implants Model: TSVT

TSV Implant Configurations available on select implants Model: TSVM

Advantages

Documented 98.7% implant survival rate mean^1-14

Prospective data on 1,553 TSV MTX™ Implants (mean 36 month follow up)

Documented Clinical Success

Case Study

Immediate Placement of TSVT Dental Implants

Preoperative clinical view of the incisor extraction sockets.

TSVT Implants (4.1 mm x 16 mm) with attached fixture mounts threaded into the prepared extraction sockets.

Radiographic view at the time of placement with surgical cover screws attached.

One-year post-placement radiograph with stable marginal bone levels around TSVT implants.

Clinical view of the aesthetic outcome one-year post restoration.

Primary Stability

Soft-Bone Protocol - Advancements in Soft-Bone Implant Stability¹

| Rosenlicht

Immediate Loading

Immediate Placement and Provisionalization of Implant-Supported, Single-Tooth Restorations: A Retrospective Study²

| El-Chaar and Bettach

Implant Insertion Torque

Histologic and Biomechanical Evaluation of the Effects of Implant Insertion Torque on Peri-Implant Bone Healing⁵

| Consolo et al

Tapered Screw-Vent® (TSV®) Implant Clinical Compendium

Resources

Frequently Asked Questions

Additional Information

Product clearance and availability may be limited to certain countries/regions. Please contact your local sales representative or customer service team.

Data on file with Zimmer Biomet Dental.
Shiigai T. Pilot study in the identification of stability values for determining immediate and early loading of Implants. J Oral Implantol. 2007;33:13-22.
Park SH, Lee KW, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Shotwell J, Wang HL. Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:32-41.
Steigmann M, Wang HL. Esthetic buccal flap for correction of buccal fenestration defects during flapless immediate implant surgery. J Periodontol. 2006; 77:517-522.
Lee CYS. Immediate load protocol for anterior maxilla with cortical bone from mandibular ramus. Implant Dent. 2006;15:153-159.
Cannizzaro G, Felice P, Leone M, Viola P, Esposito M. Early loading of implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: lateral sinus lift with autogenous bone and Bio-Oss versus crestal mini sinus lift and 8-mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;2:25-38.
Siddiqui AA, O’Neal R, Nummikoski P, Pituch D, Ochs M, Huber H, Chung W, Phillips K, Wang IC. Immediate loading of single-tooth restorations: one-year prospective results. J Oral Implantol. 2008;34:208-218.
Ormianer Z, Schiroli G. Maxillary single-tooth replacement utilizing a novel ceramic restorative system: results to 30 months. J Oral Implant ol. 2006;32: 190-199.
Artzi Z, Parsori A, Nemcovsky CE. Wide-diameter implant placement and internal sinus membrane elevation in the immediate postextraction phase: clinical and radiographic observations in 12 consecutive molar sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:242-249.
Khayat PG, Milliez SN. Prospective clinical evaluation of 835 multithreaded Tapered Screw-Vent implants: results after two years of functional loading. J Oral Implantol. 2007;34:225-231.
Ormianer Z, Garg AK, Palti A. Immediate loading of implant overdentures using modified loading protocol. Implant Dent. 2006;15:35-40.
Lee CYS, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS. Immediate loading of the grafted maxillary sinus using platelet rich plasma and autogenous bone: a preliminary study with histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Implant Dent. 2008;17:59-73.
Lee CYS, Hasegawa H. Immediate load and esthetic zone considerations to replace maxillary incisor teeth using a new zirconia implant abutment in the bone grafted anterior maxilla. J Oral Implantol. 2008;34:259-267
Ormianer Z, Palti A. Long-term clinical evaluation of tapered multi-threaded implants: results and influences of potential risk factors. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32:300-307.
Rosenlicht JL. Advancements in soft bone implant stability. West Indian Dent J 2002; 6: 2-7.
Trisi P, Marcato C, Todisco M. Bone-to-implant apposition with machined and MTX microtextured implant surfaces in human sinus grafts. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23(5): 427-437.
Todisco M, Trisi P. Histomorphometric evaluation of six dental implant surfaces after early loading in augmented human sinuses. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32(4):153-166.
El Chaar E, Bettach R. Immediate placement and provisionalization of implant-supported, single-tooth restorations: a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011; 31(4).
Consolo U, Travaglini D, Todisco M, Trisi P, Galli S. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of the effects of implant insertion torque on peri-implant bone healing. J Craniofac Surg. 2013; 24: 860-865.
Trisi P, Todisco M, Consolo U, Travaglini D. High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible. The Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 837-849.
Mihalko WM, May TC, Kay JF, Krause WP. Finite element analysis of interface geometry effects on the crestal bone surrounding a dental implant. Implant Dent. 1992;1:212-217.
Chun HJ, Shin HS, Han CH, Lee SH. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:105-202.
Brunette DM, Chehroudi B. The effects of the surface topography of micromachined titanium substrata on cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomech Eng 1999;121(1):49-75.
Cosyn J, Sabzevar MM, de Wilde P, de Rouck. Two-piece implants with turned versus microtextured collars. J Periodontal 2007;78:1657-1663.
Mazor Z, Cohen DK. Preliminary 3-dimensional surface texture measurement and early loading results with a microtextured implant surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18(5):729-738.
Chehroudi B, Gould TRL, Brunette DM. Effects of a grooved titanium-coated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:1067-1085.
Harel N, Piek D, Livne S, Palti A, Ormianer Z. A 10-Year retrospective clinical evaluation of immediately loaded tapered maxillary implants. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26: 244-249.
Ormianer Z, Palti A. The use of tapered implants in the maxillae of periodontally susceptible patients: 10- Year Outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 442-448.
Binon PP. The evolution and evaluation of two interference-fit implant interfaces. Postgraduate Dent. 1996;3:3-13.
Burgess AV, et al. Highly crystalline MP-1 hydroxylapatite coating. Part I: in vitro characterization and comparison to other plasma-sprayed hydroxylapatite coatings. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:245–256.
Shin SY, Han DH. Influence of a microgrooved collar design on soft and hard tissue healing of immediate implantation in fresh extraction sites in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:804-814.
American Society for Testing and Materials Committee on Standards. Designation B348-94. Standard specification for titanium. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Vol. 02.04. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1994: 141-146.
American Society of Testing and Materials International. Designation F67-06. Standard specification for unalloyed titanium for surgical implant applications. 2006.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5832-2: Implants for surgery – metallic materials – part 2: unalloyed titanium. Available online at: http://www.iso.org.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5832-2: Implants for surgery – metallic materials – part 3: wrought titanium. 1996. Available online at: http://www.iso.org.
Chang YL, et al. Biomechanical and morphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants with varying crystallinity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:1096–1108.
Lee JW, et al. Preliminary Biomechanical and Histological Evaluations of Implants with Different Surfaces in an Ovine Model: Abstract presented at AO 2013 Conference, Tampa, Florida. (Study of 60 implants[30 each – Zimmer MP-1 HA and Straumann SLActive] placed bilaterally by a licensed clinician in femoral condyles of ovines [6 implants per ovine]).

Tapered Screw-Vent® (TSV) Dental Implant System

A Legacy Of Performance

With over 20 years of clinical use and millions of implants sold, the TSV Implant has gained the trust of thousands of surgeons worldwide to deliver successful patient outcomes.

Benefits

Experience the confidence provided by a history of success​.

Designed for immediacy2,7,15

The primary stability achieved by TSV Implants enables immediate placement and/or immediate loading in appropriately selected patients.

Favorable conditions for crestal bone maintenance21,22

The proprietary internal hex creates a Friction Fit Connection that shields the crestal bone from occlusal force.

Features

​MTX ® or MP-1® HA Surfaces

High bone-to-implant contact and osteoconductive capacity16,17,36

Soft and Dense Bone Protocols

Enables bone compression and stability in poor quality sites15

Coronal Options

Available with and without coronal microgrooves and texturing to address clinical preferences

Advantages

Documented 98.7% implant survival rate mean1-14

Prospective data on 1,553 TSV MTX™ Implants (mean 36 month follow up)

Documented Clinical Success

Case Study

Primary Stability

Immediate Loading

Implant Insertion Torque

Tapered Screw-Vent® (TSV®) Implant Clinical Compendium

Resources

English

Trabecular Metal®, TSV®, and Eztetic®3.1 mmD

Trabecular Metal™ and Tapered Screw-Vent® Implant Systems Product Catalog

Trabecular Metal®, Tapered Screw-Vent® (TSV®), and Eztetic® 3.1 mmD Implant Systems Product Catalog

Tapered Screw-Vent® Implant - A Legacy of Performance Brochure

Tapered Screw-Vent® (TSV®) Implant Clinical Compendium

Trabecular Metal® and Tapered Screw-Vent® Implant Systems Manual

Trabecular Metal® and Tapered Screw-Vent® Implant Systems Manual

French

Tapered Screw-Vent® (TSV®) Implant Clinical Compendium

Trabecular Metal® and Tapered Screw-Vent® Implant Systems Manual

Spanish

Tapered Screw-Vent® Implant - A Legacy of Performance Brochure

Tapered Screw-Vent® (TSV®) Implant Clinical Compendium

Trabecular Metal® and Tapered Screw-Vent® Implant Systems Manual

Frequently Asked Questions

​ What are the indications for the Tapered Screw-Vent (TSV) Implant?

What clinical evidence is available on the TSV Implant?

What are the benefits of the TSV Friction-Fit Internal Hex (Platform Plus) Connection?​

​ How is primary stability with the TSV Implant achieved in soft bone?

What versions of the TSV Implant are available?

Additional Information

Product clearance and availability may be limited to certain countries/regions. Please contact your local sales representative or customer service team.

References

Product Availability

Trademark & Legal

Experience the confidence provided by a history of success.

Designed for immediacy^2,7,15

Favorable conditions for crestal bone maintenance^21,22

MTX ® or MP-1® HA Surfaces

High bone-to-implant contact and osteoconductive capacity^16,17,36

Enables bone compression and stability in poor quality sites¹⁵

Documented 98.7% implant survival rate mean^1-14